A COMPARISON OF POST-OPERATIVE PAIN RELIEF AFTER ELECTIVE LSCS WITH LOCAL AND INTRAPERITONEAL ROPIVACAINE INSTILLATION AGAINST LOCAL ROPIVACAINE INFILTRATION ALONE

Objectives: For an anesthesiologist, the post-operative phase is just as crucial pre-operative and intraoperative periods. Whether a surgery performed under regional or general anesthesia, goal should always be to provide patients with pain-free comfortable recovery. Spinal anesthesia frequently used during caesarean sections, but its effects only last for few hours. As result, various multidisciplinary analgesia strategies side have been attempted postpartum relieve pain because they may also harmful newborn baby’s health. It has already proven; injecting ropivacaine far safer alternative bupivacaine. We compared local infiltration of injectable alone both intraperitoneal instillation in individuals who had cesarean surgery. In present study, 0.5% were management following elective section spinal anesthesia. Methods: Pregnant women ASA Grades I II having planned divided into two groups at random (R1 R2 group, each 30 patients). Patients Group R1 received 15 mL injection incision site. injections 5 before peritoneal closure infiltrations 10 site skin closure. The duration was calculated by timing start sensory block point which rescue sought throughout period. Pain intensity measured using visual analog scale (VAS). Data on hemodynamics gathered. Results: lasted much longer than that (p<0.05). mean (±SD) analgesic 147.17±4.67 170.33±3.69 min, respectively. (SD) VAS scores moment first demand 36.7±5.14 32.6±6.52, Conclusion: When combined inj. enhances procedures.